Table of Contents
I would certainly add Toyota 2/3TC electric motor is someplace in the top three however with those domestics you definitely have my leading 4 of all time for integrity. Brian created: I miss my 4.9 truck. Never ever had an engine issue. Corrosion is a different story. When the exhaust rusted off behind the cat it simply seemed like a diesel.
I wonder how hard a swap it would be to get it into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ... has a difficult time leaving it's very own way ... the 300i6 would do whatever I require this vehicle to do patgizz wrote: 3 things in the vehicle globe refuse to damage.
those need to be held as the standard to which every little thing else is determined. Nearly whatever else fades in contrast. And the Toyota 2f/3f (based upon the chevy stovebolt 6 naturally) Wow, due to the outpour of praise, it looked excellent so I bought it, below's the advertisement lmk what you guys assume Oops, didn't indicate to be puzzling, it slipped my mind that the "5.0" was practically a 4.9 l.
first order of biz however, I'm fairly large, and the steering wheel to seat is fairly narrow ... man that wheel cover was not ribbed for my pleasure:-LRB- The only trouble I've ever before seen with vehicles like that, are broken shifters. Ford made them a little too difficult and they would snap right at the floorboard.
Remember the gas mileage won't be the finest on the planet, however it will certainly damn sure run for life. Edit: I'm 6'2" and 280. I always had lots of space in the taxicab of them. wbjones wrote: Brian created: I miss my 4.9 vehicle. Never had an engine concern.
When the exhaust rusted off behind the cat it simply seemed like a diesel. In 4x4 it returned 15 mixed, 20 freeway with the OD5. I ask yourself exactly how hard a swap it would be to obtain it into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ... has a tough time leaving it's own way ... The engine bay wasn't made for anything longer than a Mod electric motor. One canister eliminate an engine from a '97 design F-150 from the top, however it sucks. Mod electric motors need ahead out sideways and you need to pull the damper and water pump off of a 4.2. The core assistance does not unlock like in F250s and later F150s.
"They are normally reliable as gravity so long as they aren't sludged up" What engine loves sludge? Knurled created: wbjones wrote: Brian created: I miss my 4.9 truck.
Corrosion is a different story. When the exhaust rusted off behind the pet cat it simply seemed like a diesel. In 4x4 it returned 15 mixed, 20 highway with the OD5. I question how hard a swap it would certainly be to obtain it into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ...
Really very cramped engine bay lengthwise. yeah, had actually currently figured that out ... it was a tongue in cheek article, that I didn't make clear ... my poor In respond to spitfirebill: I included that point since when I needed to find a substitute 4.9 for my F150, I had to go through every one in every junkyard in South Jacket to find one that wasn't sludged up really severely.
Bernie: Which is a far better van, while we're mosting likely to speak about a few problems of these vans, yet I I'm plainly not going to come out and state one is better than the other. So if that's what you're searching for, you'll have to wait. Mark: So what are a few of the distinctions between these two brands? Bernie: Well, they're basically the very same lorry.
They appear to be a little bit much more utilized in that area, however, you understand, those are several of the uses, but they're basically the exact same group of automobile. Mark: So, well, let's start with engines then. What concerns do you see in between these 2 cars? Bernie: Yeah. Allow's speak concerning engine and really just to specify that the model years, we're going to start from 2000 and up, you understand, I suggest, these vans have been around for a long time.
And, you understand, for a variation of a Chevy van has been around considering that, you know, around that time too. Considering that 2000, I imply, Ford's, you can obtain these with V6 engines or V8s.
There's a great deal of issues with these engines. In the earlier 2000 stimulate plugs with blow to these engines, due to the fact that they really did not have enough threading in the spark plug, which created problems.
Really really cramped engine bay lengthwise. yeah, had actually already figured that out ... it was a tongue in cheek blog post, that I really did not make clear ... my bad In reply to spitfirebill: I included that point because when I needed to find a substitute 4.9 for my F150, I had to go with each in every junkyard in South Jersey to locate one that wasn't sludged up actually severely.
Bernie: Which is a better van, while we're going to speak concerning a few problems of these vans, yet I I'm plainly not going to come out and state one is much better than the other. Bernie: Well, they're basically the same vehicle.
They seem to be a bit much more used because area, however, you understand, those are several of the uses, however they're basically the same group of automobile. Mark: So, well, allow's start with engines then. What concerns do you see in between these two cars? Bernie: Yeah. Let's speak concerning engine and in fact simply to specify that the design years, we're going to begin from 2000 and up, you recognize, I indicate, these vans have been around for a long time.
And, you recognize, for a variation of a Chevy van has actually been around considering that, you understand, around that time too. So we're not going to get back into, right into the earlier things. Because 2000, I mean, Ford's, you can obtain these with V6 engines or V8s. V8s are a lot extra preferred and I wouldn't really recommend a V6 engine.
There's a whole lot of issues with these engines. In the earlier 2000 trigger plugs with strike to these engines, because they really did not have adequate threading in the stimulate plug, which caused problems.
Navigation
Latest Posts
Ford F150 dealership near me Miami, Missouri
Ford F150 dealership
Ford F150 dealer